Group Admins

  • Avatar Image

Structural

Public Group active 1 year, 1 month ago

Observations of structural damage

  • admin posted an update in the group AvatarStructural:   1 year, 7 months ago · View

    You may view more reports and observations on our ”Reports from the field” page at http://eqclearinghouse.org/20100903-christchurch/reports-from-the-field/.

  • Fred Turner uploaded the file: Closeup of Christchurch Hospital former wing to AvatarStructural   1 year, 8 months ago · View

    Hairline x cracks at the top level of unreinforced masonry infill walls on the exterior of this former hospital building. Concrete walls above this level were uncracked. The building was closed to use as a hostel after the earthquake for unspecified reasons. [ Click here to download ]

  • Fred Turner uploaded the file: Former Christchurch Hospital to AvatarStructural   1 year, 8 months ago · View

    First three stories 1931 concrete encased steel frame and unreinforced masonry infill walls and the upper floors 1941 steel frame with cast in place concrete walls. [ Click here to download ]

  • Fred Turner posted an update in the group AvatarStructural:   1 year, 8 months ago · View

    On Saturday, 9/11, I walked the Central Business District of Christchurch using prior reports of severe damage and references to retrofitted buildings as a guide. By the end of the week, 19 previously retrofitted buildings were observed in greater Christchurch and one in Lincoln. The retrofitted portions of these buildings performed quite well in comparison with similar unretrofitted buildings nearby. The retrofits ranged in age with most taking place over the last several decades. Information that may eventually become available could help clarify the criteria to which these buildings were retrofitted. In several cases, retrofits appear to have consisted only of parapet braces and wall anchors to floors and roofs. In addition, several buildings had been partially retrofitted. In some of those buildings, the unstrengthened portions suffered severe damage in sharp contrast with retrofitted portions. Access to the interiors of these buildings were generally not sought, so additional information about the retrofits and their performance from others will hopefully help our understanding. Many of the unretrofitted buildings appeared to have relatively low mortar strength and often unfilled collar joints, so gaining information about the design of retrofits of similar buildings in the vicinity will be an important benchmark of performance for regions of the world with similar strengths, configurations and hazards. A notable variety of techniques were used for retrofitting unreinforced masonry including throughbolts, screen anchors, glass fibre reinforced polymer, and the addition of external steel vertical and horizontal elements. Buckling restrained braced frames and eccentric braced frames were observed in retrofits of institutional buildings. These methods did not exhibit systematic vulnerabilities as a result of this particular sequence of earthquakes.

    Many modern and relatively undamaged buildings and their occupants in older commercial districts were also indirectly impacted by the disruption caused by nearby severely damaged buildings. Falling hazards generally tended to stem from unreinforced masonry that experienced failures of unbraced parapets and inadequate between upper walls and roofs.

    Glass breakage was prevalent in many midrise commercial and institutional buildings, some from the mid-20th century and newer.

    Over 15,000 chimneys have been estimated by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission to have suffered severe damage. In the past, Christchurch has prohibited most uses of chimneys and have encouraged homeowners to replace the use of chimneys for heat with more efficient and less polluting sources. As a result, a significant number of homeowners had removed the tops of chimneys frome their homes prior to the earthquake.

    Some wood frame buildings utilize brick masonry walls as fire separations near property lines. Incompatibility of deformations between the more flexible wood frame systems and the more rigid masonry walls caused severe damage in the walls in several buildings.

    Many low-rise unreinforced masonry buildings utilized cavity wall construction with wire ties connecting wythes of brick. Severe damage due primarily to out-of-plane response and instability occurred in some of these wall systems.

    Severely damaged unreinforced masonry buildings have created challenges for barricading and disruption to keep the public from being exposed to loose elements that could fall, particularly on streets and intersections with busy pedestrian and auto uses.

    Reportedly only one fire occurred in the Central Business District of Christchurch when electricity was restored.

  • admin posted an update in the group AvatarStructural:   1 year, 8 months ago · View

    Preliminary Report on Bridge Damage from the Darfield (New Zealand) M7.1 earthquake of September 4, 2010 – Draft of 2010-09-13 by by Michel Bruneau, Myrto Anagnostopoulou, and Alessandro Palermo may be viewed here: http://eqclearinghouse.org/20100903-christchurch/reports-from-the-field/preliminary-report-on-bridge-damage-from-the-darfield-new-zealand-m7-1-earthquake-of-september-4-2010-%E2%80%93-draft-of-2010-09-13/

  • Fred Turner joined the group AvatarStructural   1 year, 8 months ago · View

  • Ruben Negrete uploaded the file: URM Building Severe Damage Compilation from Canterbury to AvatarStructural   1 year, 8 months ago · View

    This file was provided by the California Seismic Safety Commission (CSSC). So far the CSSC has not found evidence of prior retrofits in these URM buildings with severe damage. Many other URMs downtown are suspected to have been retrofitted. Severe damage is scattered and consistent with MMI VIII observed in past California earthquakes.

  • Ruben Negrete joined the group AvatarStructural   1 year, 8 months ago · View